Sunday, March 08, 2009
Barkat Defends Jerusalem
3/08/2009 09:01:00 AM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
At least someone in the government has what it takes to say what is needed and when it is needed (even though pressure afterwords may (or may not) have forced him to somewhat recant).
As we all know, the Arabs do massive amounts of illegal construction in Jerusalem in order to Arabize the city, and the Jerusalem municipality is trying to fight these illegal expansions, outposts, and settlements, in part by tearing down these illegally built constructs.
The Obama-Clinton administration stuck their noses in the middle and Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat said it like it needed to be said:
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat claimed that Clinton had been misled by the Palestinians. "I totally reject the criticism [of destroying the illegally built buildings]," Barkat said. "It is a lot of air. There is no substance. Maybe it is because there is a new administration in the States. I am not willing to say the houses will remain houses. It is the wrong signal to send to people who break the law."
The US Embassy inJerusalem Tel Aviv complained to the Prime Minister (would that be Olmert still?) saying that Barkat insulted Clinton, and then the Prime Minister's office then offered a retractions saying that Barkat didn't mean that Clinton was being criticized, only the Arabs that were feeding her false information which she accepted as gospel.
As we all know, the Arabs do massive amounts of illegal construction in Jerusalem in order to Arabize the city, and the Jerusalem municipality is trying to fight these illegal expansions, outposts, and settlements, in part by tearing down these illegally built constructs.
The Obama-Clinton administration stuck their noses in the middle and Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat said it like it needed to be said:
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat claimed that Clinton had been misled by the Palestinians. "I totally reject the criticism [of destroying the illegally built buildings]," Barkat said. "It is a lot of air. There is no substance. Maybe it is because there is a new administration in the States. I am not willing to say the houses will remain houses. It is the wrong signal to send to people who break the law."
The US Embassy in
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
▼
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
-
▼
March 2009
(34)
- The Cellcom Scam
- Wanting it both ways
- Sick, sick, sick
- Too much moderation
- A Thank You Letter to Moshe
- Is the Red-Dead a Dead-End?
- Sleeping Well
- Water Water Everywhere
- Firs
- The "Aggressive" IDF Soldier
- How Revealing
- Antisemitic?!
- Caroline Glick Makes a Mistake
- Israel Stands Alone
- Kids do the darndest things
- First Thought (Part 2)
- National Union - An initial success
- The Two-State Solution
- The Attitude of Ingratitude
- It's about time
- It's like Purim in the real world
- This is not a Purim Post
- Regifting
- Boycott Alerts
- 2 Monkeys
- Barkat Defends Jerusalem
- Blot out any remembrance of Amalek
- Sins of Omission
- Those Whacky Chareidim (2)
- Barak, Barak
- Does Leiberman Understand Arabic?
- Ending the Threat
- Wards of the State World
- The Norwegian Law
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
1 comments:
I wonder if this will even warrant more than a post-it on someone's desk at the State Dept.
Post a Comment