Tuesday, June 30, 2009
What will Barak accomplish?
6/30/2009 02:22:00 AM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
Ehud Barak is in a funny position. Politically he is quite close to Obama, but he also represents the Israeli government and thus he quite opposes Obama too.
Tomorrow morning (US time), Barak will be meeting with US Envoy George "No more Jewish Births" Mitchell. The question on everyone's mind is what position will Barak take.
(He's bringing along Dan Meridor, the most far Left Likudnk in the bunch).
Whether the events of the past 2 days are coincidence or not (sure), Israel has made it very clear that they don't think much of Obama and Hillary's demands on the subject of settlement freezes and cessation, as well as the Obama administration's backtracking on previous understandings with Israel.
In the past 2 days Israel announced plans to expand new housing starts in Ma'aleh Adumim, Givat Ze'ev and Adam (though in part by moving the Migron residents into the expanded Adam village).
I don't think the message can be more explicit or "in your face" than that. (Much better than that Obama shoe picture).
Except perhaps when Netanyahu canceled his meeting with Mitchell and sent Barak to talk to him in his place.
So with Obama failing (politically an morally) on every troubled international arena he's playing in right now (Iran, Honduras, North Korea, Iraq, etc.), and going back on agreements and understandings with previous Israeli administrations (including one Netanyahu was a part of) Netanyahu has become emboldened to do more right things than wrong things (so far).
The Obama administration even seems to be taken aback by the ferocity of response by the average Israeli on the street who for the most part doesn't trust Obama and thinks his positions are anti-Israeli.
Altogether, with Israel putting forth such a united front, the State Department spokesman has started to hem and haw, talking about negotiations on the US positions and taking a "wait and see" attitude on the upcoming meeting.
Unfortunately rumor has it, that Barak may offer a 3 month freeze - whatever that actually means, as we are currently under a freeze, which has slowed down new construction significantly.
But the question still remains, who will Ehud Barak represent? His personal political viewpoint, or the governments? (And obviously just what is the government's position?)
And still it would be nice to see Obama do yet another flip flop and "clarification" of what he really meant. Just for the amusement factor.
(Why would Netanyahu offer a 3 month freeze and restart talks with the Palestinian enemy for nothing?
Because Obama has linked dealing with Iran to "Peace progress", and this will remove Obama's stated objections to dealing with Iran - which is existential threat number 1 to Israel right now.
And that will push Obama into a corner to either act, or prove that he is not a trustworthy ally, and then all cards are off the table.)
Tomorrow morning (US time), Barak will be meeting with US Envoy George "No more Jewish Births" Mitchell. The question on everyone's mind is what position will Barak take.
(He's bringing along Dan Meridor, the most far Left Likudnk in the bunch).
Whether the events of the past 2 days are coincidence or not (sure), Israel has made it very clear that they don't think much of Obama and Hillary's demands on the subject of settlement freezes and cessation, as well as the Obama administration's backtracking on previous understandings with Israel.
In the past 2 days Israel announced plans to expand new housing starts in Ma'aleh Adumim, Givat Ze'ev and Adam (though in part by moving the Migron residents into the expanded Adam village).
I don't think the message can be more explicit or "in your face" than that. (Much better than that Obama shoe picture).
Except perhaps when Netanyahu canceled his meeting with Mitchell and sent Barak to talk to him in his place.
So with Obama failing (politically an morally) on every troubled international arena he's playing in right now (Iran, Honduras, North Korea, Iraq, etc.), and going back on agreements and understandings with previous Israeli administrations (including one Netanyahu was a part of) Netanyahu has become emboldened to do more right things than wrong things (so far).
The Obama administration even seems to be taken aback by the ferocity of response by the average Israeli on the street who for the most part doesn't trust Obama and thinks his positions are anti-Israeli.
Altogether, with Israel putting forth such a united front, the State Department spokesman has started to hem and haw, talking about negotiations on the US positions and taking a "wait and see" attitude on the upcoming meeting.
Unfortunately rumor has it, that Barak may offer a 3 month freeze - whatever that actually means, as we are currently under a freeze, which has slowed down new construction significantly.
But the question still remains, who will Ehud Barak represent? His personal political viewpoint, or the governments? (And obviously just what is the government's position?)
And still it would be nice to see Obama do yet another flip flop and "clarification" of what he really meant. Just for the amusement factor.
(Why would Netanyahu offer a 3 month freeze and restart talks with the Palestinian enemy for nothing?
Because Obama has linked dealing with Iran to "Peace progress", and this will remove Obama's stated objections to dealing with Iran - which is existential threat number 1 to Israel right now.
And that will push Obama into a corner to either act, or prove that he is not a trustworthy ally, and then all cards are off the table.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
▼
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
-
▼
June 2009
(31)
- What will Barak accomplish?
- Anthing to keep Them out
- A tax on the stupid
- Leonard Cohen to perform in a Settlement
- How fragile democracy really is!
- A quick question on US-Iran relations
- Whither Twitter Iran
- Cherry Picking
- The Joke is on You
- Strengthening Bibi
- Bibi's Speech
- Election Fraud or Revolution
- Tekoa
- Poll: 56% of Israelis back settlement construction
- Likud MK proposes Israeli sanctions on US
- Has Shas found God?
- Hezollah Loses - and Wins
- Got a problem with your Zakat?
- Why can't the Right lead?
- American-born bloggers vent anger at Obama online
- Historical Rights
- 'IDF troops more polite than PA police'
- It all in the spin...
- Do I really need to say anything else?
- Barack's Nobel Prize Winners
- The Barbary Pirates
- Ich bin ein Islamist
- Obama’s Wishful Thinking
- Obama threatens Israel (again)
- A Fundamental Question
- Barak's Tactics
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
5 comments:
I'M A BIT CONFUSED BY A STATEMENT IN YOUR BLOG WHICH SAYS -
"But the question still remains, who will Ehud Barak represent? His personal political viewpoint, or the governments? (And obviously just what is the government's position?)"
HOW DOES THE GOVERNMENT FUNCTION? DOES BARAK REPRESENT THE "GOVERNMENT" OR DOES HE LITERALLY SPEAK FOR HIMSELF. IF HE SPEAKS ONLY FOR HIMSELF WHY IS HE BEING SENT?
I FEEL I'M MISSING SOMETHING HERE. CAN YOU CLARIFY THIS FOR ME? THANKS
AZ
Simply, will he be able to overcome his strong, natural inclination to agree with Obama
Article detailing the different positions of the various ministers
FROM CAROL HERMAN
Off topic, but "obvious." Michael Jackson's sperm wasn't use to make his 3 kids. He had a "helper." (And, when he was young? He probably took hormones to keep his voice from changing.) But back then? Nobody asked any questions.
Now, back on topic. Today DEBKA said "Obama wants to knock Bibi out of the prime minister's chair, so Ehud Barak can jump into it. HELLO! Labor doesn't have enough seats to be in any ballgame. The only reason Ehud Barak is in the Defense portfolio; has to do with actions taken ... when Bibi was out of government. And, Livni's seat was shaken loose.
I don't see Livni returning to power any time soon. Just as I don't see Arik Sharon ever waking up from his coma.
Yes, Obama "plays" with Israel. Still looking to better his acceptance among people who didn't even vote for him in the first place. To groups that did vote for Obama? They've been told to drink the poison.
I don't see Obama as all that successful. I see him with a broken teleprompter. And, other than the fact that the elite media drool, I don't see him making any gains.
If this were basketball? You'd see soon enough that with all of Obama's fancy steps, he can't shoot into the basket. And, he can't, these days, even do good set ups.
In other words? It could have been worse for Bibi. Except that NOW, because of the American pressure, Bibi has gained political traction. And, Obama has no idea what an Israeli is. To Obama? All Jews are academics; who can get beaten up. And, who don't complain. While many American Jews can't even identify their town's rabbi. I kid you not.
The more you think things stay the same, the more different they are.
And, how can you take a country seriously, when in Congress, there was a "moment of silence" for Michael Jackson. I kid you not!
Barak will accomplish STAYING IN OFFICE! He came in behind Livni. And, he out-foxed her!
As to what Barak says? He's a student of the art of saying things that don't amount to much. Just as in one of his acts of heroism, he got into Beirut. Dressed as a brunette. Got to his target. And, got home from a successful mission.
These days? He doesn't have to wear a dress to the White House. But he's not about to make mistakes. While, yes. I think he gets a closer look at Obama, and the ballerina with the filthy mouth; who guides Obama's programs.
After you deal with arabs, this new gig has its amusements.
FROM CAROL HERMAN
The "peace process" is like a puzzle piece that doesn't fit into the picture. There's this "space."
Why, after Oslo failed, and Israelis tossed Peres out of any safe seat you'd get through elections; And, of course, Rabin was killed. Why has Israel traveled the "peace process" line, as if it was Cunard?
Arik Sharon got a stroke from playing the "peace game" with Dubya. This process should be laying in the bed right next to Arik SHaron! It's BRAIN DEAD, too.
Instead? It's some sort of diplomatic "passage." And, I don't know why.
Livni didn't carry the day, either.
As a matter of fact, she, too, has disappeared from her claim that she deserved to be prime minister; at least part of the time.
Is it possible the "peace process" is just a game? Livni keeps thinking she's gonna "get a 3:00am call." Lieberman will be tossed from government. And, Livni and her Kadimi party thieves of ministers, will come back into the money pot?
Gee. I'm missing something, here.
Perhaps? (And, I do give Bibi credit for being clever.) At some point the arabs will have to do "more" than say "they're about to withdraw their offer from the table." Take it. Or leave it.
Take it or leave it is not a negotiation tactic.
While, there ya go. Israel keeps playing the "DEAD CAT ON YOUR DOORSTEP" game, invented by James Baker.
Other than that? I keep turning over this piece. And, it doesn't bring peace to the puzzle. It hangs out there.
Sure, any millstone you hang around Obama's neck will do the world a favor. Do ya think that's why the game gets played?
Post a Comment