Monday, July 20, 2009
Conflict in Obama's House
7/20/2009 10:36:00 PM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
As I mentioned, Ynet is confirming that there conflict in Obama's Utopia.
The report states that there are "professional difference" between Mitchell and Clinton, which would help explain why Clinton has no clue as to Mitchell's itinerary and why Clinton seems to have been cut out of other key developments.
Meanwhile, Elliot Abrams says that Mitchell actually wants to resign - but Obama will only let him do that after he succeeds in getting some sort of settlement freeze. He continues on to make fun of Obama's policy and says that a settlement freeze at this point would backfire on Obama, who would then have to actually get the Arabs to give something in return. But if the freeze fails, He can still blame Israel, but then Mitchell retires in disgrace (or he can't retire at all).
The report states that there are "professional difference" between Mitchell and Clinton, which would help explain why Clinton has no clue as to Mitchell's itinerary and why Clinton seems to have been cut out of other key developments.
Meanwhile, Elliot Abrams says that Mitchell actually wants to resign - but Obama will only let him do that after he succeeds in getting some sort of settlement freeze. He continues on to make fun of Obama's policy and says that a settlement freeze at this point would backfire on Obama, who would then have to actually get the Arabs to give something in return. But if the freeze fails, He can still blame Israel, but then Mitchell retires in disgrace (or he can't retire at all).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
▼
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
-
▼
July 2009
(24)
- Slated for Destruction (2)
- Israel wants the Third Temple built
- Numbers
- Antisemitism and Crime
- Leonard come home
- Lieberman to distribute photo
- May'Ever l'Yarden
- Conflict in Obama's House
- Jerusalem - The Modern City
- Normal Life
- Will Obama flip-flop and make Mitchell a liar?
- Another reason to boycott Israel and the Jews - pl...
- Hareidi Riots
- Stealing History
- No Bullets, No Booze
- Shooting ourselves in the foot (again)
- Netanyahu-Mitchell meeting canceled?
- 17th of Tammuz
- Not even chased out!
- Lessons never learned
- Does the Road to Iran go through "Palestine'?
- "The air in Eretz Yisrael causes wisdom"
- How Important I Am
- (Ehud) Barak holds his ground
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
2 comments:
FROM CAROL HERMAN
In politics, when you're the leader of a democracy, you must first weigh what you do. Because you're going to be spending political capital.
Obama? What a rookie. He's already gone into the White House "closet" and removed Jimmy Carter's lesson book. (What's that? Jimmy Carter couldn't believe he'd lose to Ronald Reagan.)
At least, because God works in strange ways, Obama, instead of being on a roll, has discovered "set backs."
You think "set backs" are easy to cure? Not in politics! That George Mitchell wants to resign? You know, he's an old, old man. He can always just check himself into a hospital and feign a fainting spell.
You think I'm kidding?
If Hillary could kiss her elbow, she'd let you know it was a fortuous break. (Unfortunately, for the Clinton's, however), Hillary may not have a democrapic party to lead, ahead?
You think Livni's got the best seat in the Israeli political house? I think she sits on a carousel horse. She goes round in circles.
While Bibi? My goodness, look at how well he played the cards he was dealt.
Do you remember the big deal about the Cairo speech? Less than a week later Iran's fraudulent election blew sky high. While Obama has yet to find "solid footing."
You know, if you're going to gamble, and its an outdoor event, check the surface where the hooves run. Sometimes, you can learn enough to keep your money in your pocket. No horse can handle a slippery slope. And, Obama, for some reason confused free publicity with riding Americans into socialism.
Isn't it wonderful to learn how dead Marx really is.
As to the future, go ahead. Point to an American president, since Truman, who earned all that much respect? (I'll give you Reagan.) That's one. And, then there are all the failures.
Just like Tolstoy said: All happy marriages look alike. It's the unhappy ones that tell individual stories.
Same is also a political reality. Why did Obama go off the way he did? Not very different from Bush. Funny, when the ears and the eyes don't take in much information.
Why can't he retire? He can just quit like the other guys who didn't like the administration's direction. Is he being threatened with losing his "Pension"?
Post a Comment