What a joke! The Post's headline is "Eldad spared probe of 'treason' remark".

I am sure that Eldad would have welcomed a probe.

He would have asked the investigators exactly what law was broken by him quoting a law on the books

Perhaps he would have asked the investigators and the courts to explain to him on whom does the law apply, and on whom it doesn't. He would have said that he as a legislator wasn''t aware that the law was only selectively applicable.

Or perhaps he would have asked when are you allowed to quote the law and when not.

There is so much he would have required them to explain, if only they had followed through with a probe.

I certainly would have wanted to hear those clarifications from those in charge.