Saturday, June 07, 2008
Obama Backs Down
6/07/2008 10:42:00 PM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
Yet another issue I've ignored is Obama.
The other day he gave a speech at AIPAC that made me want to reexamine my opinion of the man.
No need.
He later backed down and qualified his statements.
That was quick.
The other day he gave a speech at AIPAC that made me want to reexamine my opinion of the man.
No need.
He later backed down and qualified his statements.
That was quick.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
►
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
▼
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
-
▼
June 2008
(30)
- Why I'm switching to FireFox!
- On Strike
- Fair Trade
- “We don’t expect 100% success, just 100% effort.”
- Reveiwing the Law of Return in terms of Today's Pr...
- Israel does it again
- Adding Insult to Injury
- What does prayer do?
- Creative Accounting and the New Oleh
- Save Them the Trip Across the Desert
- Western Negev State - You Tread on Me
- The People of Israel lead the way... Again
- Again, Retreat
- I assume it will be deep underground
- Buying Eretz Yisrael on Shabbat
- Jewish War
- Taking a Break
- Academic Boycott in Israel
- Elections are in the air!
- Rebounding Dollar
- Reciprocity
- Obama Backs Down
- Chief Rabbi takes a stand
- Ofra Under Attack
- Excitement in Chashmonaim
- Crazy or just a Fundamentalist
- Rule of Joke
- Learn To Shoot
- Whose Remains?
- Guest Post by Treppenwitz
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
1 comments:
He didn't even need to clarify. It was obvious from the wording of what he said that that's what he meant. He never said unidivide under Israeli sovereignty. He just said Jerusalem must remain the capital of Israel and that the city must remain undivided.
I have no idea why anyone thought that meant he said that the entire unidvided Jerusalem would remain the capital of Israel.
Post a Comment