Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Sins of Omission
3/04/2009 09:49:00 AM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
Here’s the latest from the political scammers of Lieberman and Yisrael Beiteinu.
"No one asked us during the campaign if we were in favor of a Palestinian state," Israel Beiteinu MK Danny Ayalon said.
Wow, imagine that, no one thought to ask, and you forgot to mention it.
But is that really true?
Because it gets better.
The Matot Arim organization said it had received a phone commitment from MK David Rotem during the campaign that the party opposed the creation of a Palestinian state.
And an Israel Beiteinu spokeswoman had told her that Rotem had been speaking for the entire party.
But alas, in the fine print of the Yisrael Beiteinu party position paper it says:
Can it be that the party is so confused after duping their voters with rhetoric and slogans that they don’t know their own party's positions?
"No one asked us during the campaign if we were in favor of a Palestinian state," Israel Beiteinu MK Danny Ayalon said.
Wow, imagine that, no one thought to ask, and you forgot to mention it.
But is that really true?
Because it gets better.
The Matot Arim organization said it had received a phone commitment from MK David Rotem during the campaign that the party opposed the creation of a Palestinian state.
And an Israel Beiteinu spokeswoman had told her that Rotem had been speaking for the entire party.
But alas, in the fine print of the Yisrael Beiteinu party position paper it says:
2. The permanent agreement must be based on the principle of territory and population exchange, as well as the creation of two nationally homogeneous states.
Can it be that the party is so confused after duping their voters with rhetoric and slogans that they don’t know their own party's positions?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
▼
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
-
▼
March 2009
(34)
- The Cellcom Scam
- Wanting it both ways
- Sick, sick, sick
- Too much moderation
- A Thank You Letter to Moshe
- Is the Red-Dead a Dead-End?
- Sleeping Well
- Water Water Everywhere
- Firs
- The "Aggressive" IDF Soldier
- How Revealing
- Antisemitic?!
- Caroline Glick Makes a Mistake
- Israel Stands Alone
- Kids do the darndest things
- First Thought (Part 2)
- National Union - An initial success
- The Two-State Solution
- The Attitude of Ingratitude
- It's about time
- It's like Purim in the real world
- This is not a Purim Post
- Regifting
- Boycott Alerts
- 2 Monkeys
- Barkat Defends Jerusalem
- Blot out any remembrance of Amalek
- Sins of Omission
- Those Whacky Chareidim (2)
- Barak, Barak
- Does Leiberman Understand Arabic?
- Ending the Threat
- Wards of the State World
- The Norwegian Law
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
2 comments:
totally agreed, but what about kadima, livni refused a national unity gov because netanyahu opposes a 1967 border state, did she explain clearly on campaign this was the main target of the her party?
FROM CAROL HERMAN
True, the right, all together, has 65 votes. But it's not really all in one party. Bibi has been charged with pulling together a government. And, he may be forced to keep all his chips on the right. While he still needs Avigdor Lieberman.
How Ehud Barak (like Houdini) slips the "knot" of Labor, I do not know. But he sure doesn't want to sit in the opposition!
Neither does Mofaz. And, a few others who were previously in the Likud Party, anyway.
What you're seeing? A circus.
But to win, it's Bibi at the poker table. And, Livni has the weaker cards. but she's a stubborn one.
Post a Comment