Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Trading Cards
4/16/2008 09:45:00 AM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
Residents of various outposts are "voluntarily" packing up and moving out.
This is part of a larger package where the government will supposedly "legalize" and permit additional housing in existing settlements in exchange for removing the outposts.
This deal is good for the government, who simply controls the permits and the speed they are processed (most settlements have permits to extensively build going back years, but the final signature on the defense department form is then held back for years).
The government can show the Americans that they are taking down outposts (of course, ignoring what the Americans will ask for next once all the outposts are destroyed, as it doesn't stop there).
The Jews get to build some more needed housing in existing settlements - maybe, as that has yet to be seen - after all we saw how the government reneged in the Hebron deal.
But... this is a bad deal.
The government is likely to renege, and while it is easy to say that an outpost taken down is an outpost that can be returned it is not that simple.
First of all, what is called an outpost in many cases are caravans and farms that have been cultivated for years - on Jewish owned land, mind you.
Once they are abandoned, we all know the process of how the land gets stolen, even beyond Peace Now (notice how no one is talking about their alleged massive tax fraud anymore?) and their documented false reports (notice how outside of Makor Rishon, no one discusses how they fraudulently misrepresented and mistitled the data?) .
Unfortunately, the settlements are feeling the crunch of the government's freeze as we have such a high demand from Israelis all over Israel (and our expanding families) who want to move here and join us, but we don't have sufficient housing available for all those myriads.
The government controls the tap (while the Americans spin the faucet).
This is not a deal to be trusted.
This is part of a larger package where the government will supposedly "legalize" and permit additional housing in existing settlements in exchange for removing the outposts.
This deal is good for the government, who simply controls the permits and the speed they are processed (most settlements have permits to extensively build going back years, but the final signature on the defense department form is then held back for years).
The government can show the Americans that they are taking down outposts (of course, ignoring what the Americans will ask for next once all the outposts are destroyed, as it doesn't stop there).
The Jews get to build some more needed housing in existing settlements - maybe, as that has yet to be seen - after all we saw how the government reneged in the Hebron deal.
But... this is a bad deal.
The government is likely to renege, and while it is easy to say that an outpost taken down is an outpost that can be returned it is not that simple.
First of all, what is called an outpost in many cases are caravans and farms that have been cultivated for years - on Jewish owned land, mind you.
Once they are abandoned, we all know the process of how the land gets stolen, even beyond Peace Now (notice how no one is talking about their alleged massive tax fraud anymore?) and their documented false reports (notice how outside of Makor Rishon, no one discusses how they fraudulently misrepresented and mistitled the data?) .
Unfortunately, the settlements are feeling the crunch of the government's freeze as we have such a high demand from Israelis all over Israel (and our expanding families) who want to move here and join us, but we don't have sufficient housing available for all those myriads.
The government controls the tap (while the Americans spin the faucet).
This is not a deal to be trusted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
►
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
▼
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
-
▼
April 2008
(27)
- 'This will set an example for all those who sell o...
- Last but not least
- A Hot Chol HaMoed
- Tzidkiyahu's Cave and Shaar Shchem
- Things to do in Israel over Pesach
- Lessons Unlearned
- Chag Kasher v'Sameach
- The IsraelChallenge IDF Experience
- Reality imitating Art
- Trading Cards
- Things to this Pesach (1/many)
- What's Good for the Goose...
- When the Victim is the Perpetrator – Part 2
- News from Ovver the Top
- Just Another Victim or Two
- When a KeZayit isn't a KeZayit
- Measuring Success - continued
- Your Israel Bonds - Hard at Work
- Emerging Community: Efrat
- My Part for the War
- Pesach Shiurim
- When the Victim is the Perpetrator
- Saturday Night in Hebron
- Moshe Feiglin's Tested Solution for Peace
- Two Minutes of Silence
- How to Measure Success
- Brainwashing and War
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
0 comments:
Post a Comment