Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Special Joe-Jameel Book Club Review
11/14/2007 01:55:00 PM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
Long time readers remember when the Joe-Jameel Book Club used to write these amazing reviews and criticisms of Jewish books that were relevant to the topic of the day.
Unfortunately, that blog and its posts were lost in the crossover to New Blogger.
Anyway, the Joe-Jameel Book Club was asked to write a review of a book that is now being advertised on this blog.
For the sake of disclosure, I haven’t read the entire book yet, just different excerpts from it, but I believe I get the gist.
The book is called, “Sometimes you ARE what you wear!” by a Rabbi Eliyahu Safran who also works in the OU.
The catch line of the book is “an argument for Tzniut (modesty)”.
My wife tells me that in the Beis Yaakovs (plural, she was thrown out of a few of them, but not for Tznius issues) where she went to school they used to constantly give them speeches about the lengths of their skirts, covering their elbows, their hair styles and the like.
But Rabbi Safran’s book is clearly not about the length of your sleeves or the color of your shirt.
His book is about the internal aspects of Tzniut which Rabbi Safran describes as dignity, nobility, self-worth, self-respect, and self-image, and also how that translates into moral actions.
Rabbi Safran maintains that Tzniut is an internal state that is outwardly revealed by one’s choice in clothing.
Conversely, he holds that there is also an inverse and symbiotic relationship between one’s clothing and one’s sense of self. The clothing also makes the man, or as scientific studies have shown, while one may smile as a sign of internal happiness, people that smile tend to end up feeling internally happy.
To quote him, “How we dress influences more than just those who look at us, it influences how we see ourselves. If you don't think this is the truth, see how differently students behave in a classroom when they are wearing shirts and ties versus when they are in their gym clothes.”
Tznius he argues is about bringing your body and soul into alignment and it isn’t just for women.
This isn’t a book about permissible fashion statements.
This is a book about internalizing and projecting a positive self-image from a Jewish perspective.
It’s an interesting idea. Read the book.
Unfortunately, that blog and its posts were lost in the crossover to New Blogger.
Anyway, the Joe-Jameel Book Club was asked to write a review of a book that is now being advertised on this blog.
For the sake of disclosure, I haven’t read the entire book yet, just different excerpts from it, but I believe I get the gist.
The book is called, “Sometimes you ARE what you wear!” by a Rabbi Eliyahu Safran who also works in the OU.
The catch line of the book is “an argument for Tzniut (modesty)”.
My wife tells me that in the Beis Yaakovs (plural, she was thrown out of a few of them, but not for Tznius issues) where she went to school they used to constantly give them speeches about the lengths of their skirts, covering their elbows, their hair styles and the like.
But Rabbi Safran’s book is clearly not about the length of your sleeves or the color of your shirt.
His book is about the internal aspects of Tzniut which Rabbi Safran describes as dignity, nobility, self-worth, self-respect, and self-image, and also how that translates into moral actions.
Rabbi Safran maintains that Tzniut is an internal state that is outwardly revealed by one’s choice in clothing.
Conversely, he holds that there is also an inverse and symbiotic relationship between one’s clothing and one’s sense of self. The clothing also makes the man, or as scientific studies have shown, while one may smile as a sign of internal happiness, people that smile tend to end up feeling internally happy.
To quote him, “How we dress influences more than just those who look at us, it influences how we see ourselves. If you don't think this is the truth, see how differently students behave in a classroom when they are wearing shirts and ties versus when they are in their gym clothes.”
Tznius he argues is about bringing your body and soul into alignment and it isn’t just for women.
This isn’t a book about permissible fashion statements.
This is a book about internalizing and projecting a positive self-image from a Jewish perspective.
It’s an interesting idea. Read the book.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
►
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
▼
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
-
▼
November 2007
(26)
- Peace Building is Kosher, But Still, No Jews Allowed
- The Jerusalem Feint
- On Personal Security
- Lebanon Elections (II)
- A Question of Morality
- Free Trial with WebYeshiva
- It isn't just me, is it?
- Playing Dirty?
- What's up with the British Royal Family. First we ...
- Special Joe-Jameel Book Club Review
- Liberal Hawks
- Lebanon Elections
- Joke of the Day
- Beating on a dead horse
- INCITEMENT!!!
- We’re Growing Baby
- How far Left the Left has Gone
- Win 2 Free Tickets to Israel
- Captured Audiences
- Reeducation
- Electricity Service Halted in Response to Kassams
- Self-Destructive Behavior
- US supplies Al Quaida with Money and Training
- Peki'in Revisited
- Shout out
- Welcome to JoeSettler
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
8 comments:
XGH fans thank you for the review.
And can you divulge what Mrs. Settler got thrown out of Beis Ya'akovs for?
I didn't know you read my blog!
She was thrown out for being too independent and too popular. She wasn't conformist enough. I guess they didn't consider that Tsniusdik.
While my wife considers wigs to be tnziusdik and a proper kisui rosh, I have a problem with it.
But it is actually a deep and serious question that resolves around a number of halachic and minhagic (is that a word?) issues.
I wish someone contemporary would address it properly, in English.
My $.02:
I'm thinking along the lines of true tznius is not attracting attention, not showing skin or body form, and generally the opposite of attractive. Reality is that in our society no women want to dress that way and no husbands would appreciate their wives dressing that way.
Which leaves two extreme alternatives: dress truly tznius, which a few do especially on your local hilltops, or forget about the whole thing. Not surprisingly most frum people are searching for a third way (where have I heard that before?) - hence sheitels, tights, etc, which officially conform without following the ideal.
(And no, I'm not a member of the Facebook Jameel fan club.)
I have great difficulty in taking seriously a book on modesty written by a Rabbi who derives much of his family's income from the purveying of grossly untzniusdik wigs
http://lukeford.net/blog/?p=1512
and then tries to sue people who point this simple fact out to the public.
BB: Sometimes it's not what you say, but how you say it.
My wife would strongly disagree with your statement that wigs (and particularly those) are untzniusdik.
She (and I) would agree that those particular styles are not for her though.
It is a serious question that needs to be discussed.
I didn't say that all wigs are untsniusdik - or that even all the wigs his wife sells are untsinuisdik. Just that he sells untsniusdik wigs.
My wife thinks that wigs are totally hypocritical and the fashion statements she has seen being made by my wig-wearing relatives from the old country haven't convinced her to change her mind regarding the issue of hair covering. For that matter the fact that she sees women dressing a certain way (provocatively) wearing wigs such as the type called "pretty woman" (after the movie) has been a tremendous hinderance in encouraging hair covering. Though I suppose that my personal belief that hair covering isn't required and is a subjective social norm, may play a role.
Safran needs more waffles.
Post a Comment