Monday, June 25, 2007
One-sided Human Rights
6/25/2007 02:21:00 PM |
Posted by
JoeSettler |
Edit Post
I had a post over at Muqata, but Jameel asked to take it down after he was getting some unpleasant letters off line about it from some of his regular readers who don’t want to hear controversial facts that strongly go against their predisposed belief system.
As Jameel likes to keep his environment friendly to all I will respect his wishes.
So I will post about it here.
The subject is the Arab Land Grab.
You see there is a Yishuv called Efrat which is made up ofseven one hundred 8 hills. The Yishuv is an annoying place to visit as it is all speedbumps and curves.
It is all (poorly implemented) speedbumps because their Moetza and City Engineer must be run by idiots who don’t like drivers – and don’t how to make a proper speedbump.
It is all curves because every piece of land that Efrat sits on was (indisputably) privately acquired (or former state-owned land).
So all around and criss-crossing the town are Arab-owned farms where the owners chose to not sell their land to the city and continue to work them freely (and work in Efrat too – thus supporting their families). Thus Efrat curves like a snake for quite a distance instead of being more circular and centralized.
The seventh hill of Efrat (called Eitam) was never developed (I believe it was supposed to become the town’s cemetery). But alas, the Fence that is being built may be excluding it from Efrat – the residents are currently fighting for it.
But there is another battle going on.
Around the Eitam hill, one of the highest hills in the region, strategically overlooking Jersualem and Gush Etzion are Arab farms (just like the farms that Hizbollah used to hide and launch missiles at Israel from up North).
As the government is making it difficult for Efrat to build on its own property, the Arabs keep seeing this as an opportunity to try to steal it away.
And so they occasionally go up and try to build a structure and create facts on the ground, which are usually removed.
Now to make it clear, there is no dispute or question that Efrat owns this land (parts of it were purchased by Jews some 100 years ago in fact). It is well documented Efrat property.
Yet Rabbis for Human Rights, and other fifth columnists haven’t been seen protesting and protecting the rights of the clear and undisputed owners – the Jewish people.
Not a single left-wing organization that rips out Jewish owned trees at night (or Arab-owned trees to blame the settlers) has come out to say that this is wrong or to try to stop it.
Nope, not a peep.
Though left-wing readers over by Jameel did find it offensive that Jews are trying to protect their own property.
This left-wing run government doesn’t care about Jewish property rights whether it be in Efrat, Neve Daniel, Tekoa, Bat Ayin, or anywhere else in the Gush, despite their occasional claim that the Gush is important to the security of southern Jerusalem (which it is).
So the army is now letting the Arabs get away in Efrat with what they want, just like they do near Neve Daniel and Gvaot Olam.
This Wednesday residents of Efrat will go up to reclaim their property.
It is unclear what the army and government will do – will it respect the rule of law and allow the residents of Efrat to defend their own property or will they continue to defend their lopsided enforcement and let the Arabs steal away what was bought with cold cash and signed documents.
What is for sure is that the Left will be there in full force to help the Arabs steal more land.
For shame on their claim as defenders of Human Rights.
As Jameel likes to keep his environment friendly to all I will respect his wishes.
So I will post about it here.
The subject is the Arab Land Grab.
You see there is a Yishuv called Efrat which is made up of
It is all (poorly implemented) speedbumps because their Moetza and City Engineer must be run by idiots who don’t like drivers – and don’t how to make a proper speedbump.
It is all curves because every piece of land that Efrat sits on was (indisputably) privately acquired (or former state-owned land).
So all around and criss-crossing the town are Arab-owned farms where the owners chose to not sell their land to the city and continue to work them freely (and work in Efrat too – thus supporting their families). Thus Efrat curves like a snake for quite a distance instead of being more circular and centralized.
The seventh hill of Efrat (called Eitam) was never developed (I believe it was supposed to become the town’s cemetery). But alas, the Fence that is being built may be excluding it from Efrat – the residents are currently fighting for it.
But there is another battle going on.
Around the Eitam hill, one of the highest hills in the region, strategically overlooking Jersualem and Gush Etzion are Arab farms (just like the farms that Hizbollah used to hide and launch missiles at Israel from up North).
As the government is making it difficult for Efrat to build on its own property, the Arabs keep seeing this as an opportunity to try to steal it away.
And so they occasionally go up and try to build a structure and create facts on the ground, which are usually removed.
Now to make it clear, there is no dispute or question that Efrat owns this land (parts of it were purchased by Jews some 100 years ago in fact). It is well documented Efrat property.
Yet Rabbis for Human Rights, and other fifth columnists haven’t been seen protesting and protecting the rights of the clear and undisputed owners – the Jewish people.
Not a single left-wing organization that rips out Jewish owned trees at night (or Arab-owned trees to blame the settlers) has come out to say that this is wrong or to try to stop it.
Nope, not a peep.
Though left-wing readers over by Jameel did find it offensive that Jews are trying to protect their own property.
This left-wing run government doesn’t care about Jewish property rights whether it be in Efrat, Neve Daniel, Tekoa, Bat Ayin, or anywhere else in the Gush, despite their occasional claim that the Gush is important to the security of southern Jerusalem (which it is).
So the army is now letting the Arabs get away in Efrat with what they want, just like they do near Neve Daniel and Gvaot Olam.
This Wednesday residents of Efrat will go up to reclaim their property.
It is unclear what the army and government will do – will it respect the rule of law and allow the residents of Efrat to defend their own property or will they continue to defend their lopsided enforcement and let the Arabs steal away what was bought with cold cash and signed documents.
What is for sure is that the Left will be there in full force to help the Arabs steal more land.
For shame on their claim as defenders of Human Rights.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
►
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
▼
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
-
▼
June 2007
(22)
- The Forgotten
- In my mother’s shul there is a lady there who love...
- Gays, Global Warming, and Chained Up Women
- Arab MK proposes that other MKs drop their pants
- One-sided Human Rights
- Jewish Geography
- Summer of ‘67
- A Legal Precedent?
- Mey Hodu ad Kush
- More on Beitar Elite
- It seems so hypocritical…
- Four States for No People
- Don't miss it
- An Altalena Moment, or is that just Gas?
- Mystery Solved
- Buy me, Gaydamak
- How to Make Aliyah
- A7 on JoeSettler
- My Top 12 Reasons for Living in Israel
- History is Written by the Winner
- Gag Order?
- The Other Settlers
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
►
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
- ► September 2006 (21)
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)
8 comments:
Actually, for the record, I didn't get any negative feedback from anyone offline or otherwise.
My issue is that I receive dozens of requests from people all day long to post things, and putting up a letter from Nadia isn't blog worthy. Writing up your OWN interpretation is a lot more blog-worthy.
So this is what it takes to get you to comment on my blog!
Muqata doesn't strike me a sa blog that leftists would frequent, although I find it odd that it links to the kapo dovbear blog.
Sometimes I think that kadima is quietly pursuing th geneva accords, and making life hard for the settlers so that they leave on their own.
What the ruling elite has to eventually realize is that the Jewish and xtian right are their only long term supporters.
Jewish libs support is very tenuous and shrinks each generation as does the assimmilated Jewish community. The clergy for human rights types get headlines , but who do they lead? How many of their congregants make aliyah or even spend a term in Israel?
Muqata gets its share. But mostly he and I were poking fun at each other.
I wish success for the people of Efrat.
Here's an update:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/122894
Nadia reports that the illegal Arab structures are gone.
Nadia also reports to me that their are 8 hills in Efrat, not 7!
Of course, with all those speedbumps, I would argue that there are a hundred hills at minimum - which is why I personally don't like driving through her town.
Post a Comment