Saturday, September 09, 2006
I’m sure most of you remember the front-page headlines regarding the young Chareidi Torah student from Meah Shearim who shook and beat his son to death. I’m sure you all remember how the Chareidim rioted when they went to arrest him. I’m sure you all remember the media's recriminations against this student and the Chareidi community.
Does anyone remember how much time he was sentenced with?
Last week Caroline Glick wrote an excellent piece (as usual) about Shmuel Cytryn, a boy being held, accused, and charged with attempted murder of a Gazan Palestinian without a single piece of collaborating evidence, merely because he is a right winger, and one of many people on the scene in Gaza of an event that Caroline reports didn’t happen as it was reported.
Glick reported the events based on collaborating testimony given by both sides involved in the fighting.
From people I talked with, her version sounded right to me, and she is a very careful reporter when it comes to the facts.
During the week, Larry Derfner rabidly attacked Glick’s reporting of the event.
Derfner was in Gush Katif. Derfner was even on the beachfront where the events happened.
Derfner then describes the settler youth as Judeo-fascist (I guess he couldn’t say Judeo-Nazi in the JP).
He described how the Palestinian evicted owners were there standing by their house watching. He described the evil actions of the Settler youth.
At this point I didn’t know what to make of it. He was there, and other people I spoke with were there, and he is telling a completely different story. But if he was there, maybe there is something to it.
This week Glick, rather surprised that her reporting was being questioned in her own paper wrote a response.
It seems I didn’t actually read Derfner’s article carefully enough.
You see Derfner was not actually there when the alleged stoning occurred. But he only mentions that towards the end of the article, after he has you tricked into thinking he was there, from the beginning of his article.
Derfner only showed up afterwards, and was shown a video by the reporters, the same reporters that manufactured the lynch story in the first place with their partial reporting and selective photography (we’re all familiar with that now after the Lebanon war).
More so, as is public knowledge the house was long abandoned and the boys were fixing it up, they evicted no one.
The supposed “victim” Halil Mejeida openly admits that he started and organized the attacks on the Jewish boys. He also claims that he wasn’t hit by a stone, but rather the butt of a rifle by an IDF soldier.
And amazingly enough, his life threatening wounds turned out to be rather superficial.
But for Derfner and his stereotyped negative preconceived notion of Settlers, he won’t let minor facts like that affect his agenda driven reporting.
And that’s what it is all about.
The Left report the news based on their agenda.
Last week I discussed the deceitful, skewed, omitted, distorted statistics that were reported in Yediot Achronot in order not to make the Settler look good (or that we exist at all).
The Left want to besmirch the Settlers and they want to besmirch the Chareidim. They won’t let minor points like the truth (or facts) get in the way.
So to go back to beginning of this post, you are probably wondering what happened to the murderous Torah Student from Meah Shearim. Did he go to jail? How long is his sentence for?
Well, unless you read the Chareidi papers you would probably never know.
You see, it wasn’t reported on the front page of Maariv or Yediot or Haaretz the results of the pathological examination done on the baby’s body.
If it were, you would have known that the baby didn’t die because the father hit him, beat him or dropped him.
No, the father took his baby to the hospital where quite possibly he died because of some negligence on the part of the hospital.
But in agenda driven reporting, that simply doesn’t make the front page.
I highly recommend you read Cosmix-X's post on the Cytryn story as he point out Derfner's discrepencies, bias, and all out fabrications far better than me.
And here is the A-7 post on the story.
Does anyone remember how much time he was sentenced with?
Last week Caroline Glick wrote an excellent piece (as usual) about Shmuel Cytryn, a boy being held, accused, and charged with attempted murder of a Gazan Palestinian without a single piece of collaborating evidence, merely because he is a right winger, and one of many people on the scene in Gaza of an event that Caroline reports didn’t happen as it was reported.
Glick reported the events based on collaborating testimony given by both sides involved in the fighting.
From people I talked with, her version sounded right to me, and she is a very careful reporter when it comes to the facts.
During the week, Larry Derfner rabidly attacked Glick’s reporting of the event.
Derfner was in Gush Katif. Derfner was even on the beachfront where the events happened.
Derfner then describes the settler youth as Judeo-fascist (I guess he couldn’t say Judeo-Nazi in the JP).
He described how the Palestinian evicted owners were there standing by their house watching. He described the evil actions of the Settler youth.
At this point I didn’t know what to make of it. He was there, and other people I spoke with were there, and he is telling a completely different story. But if he was there, maybe there is something to it.
This week Glick, rather surprised that her reporting was being questioned in her own paper wrote a response.
It seems I didn’t actually read Derfner’s article carefully enough.
You see Derfner was not actually there when the alleged stoning occurred. But he only mentions that towards the end of the article, after he has you tricked into thinking he was there, from the beginning of his article.
Derfner only showed up afterwards, and was shown a video by the reporters, the same reporters that manufactured the lynch story in the first place with their partial reporting and selective photography (we’re all familiar with that now after the Lebanon war).
More so, as is public knowledge the house was long abandoned and the boys were fixing it up, they evicted no one.
The supposed “victim” Halil Mejeida openly admits that he started and organized the attacks on the Jewish boys. He also claims that he wasn’t hit by a stone, but rather the butt of a rifle by an IDF soldier.
And amazingly enough, his life threatening wounds turned out to be rather superficial.
But for Derfner and his stereotyped negative preconceived notion of Settlers, he won’t let minor facts like that affect his agenda driven reporting.
And that’s what it is all about.
The Left report the news based on their agenda.
Last week I discussed the deceitful, skewed, omitted, distorted statistics that were reported in Yediot Achronot in order not to make the Settler look good (or that we exist at all).
The Left want to besmirch the Settlers and they want to besmirch the Chareidim. They won’t let minor points like the truth (or facts) get in the way.
So to go back to beginning of this post, you are probably wondering what happened to the murderous Torah Student from Meah Shearim. Did he go to jail? How long is his sentence for?
Well, unless you read the Chareidi papers you would probably never know.
You see, it wasn’t reported on the front page of Maariv or Yediot or Haaretz the results of the pathological examination done on the baby’s body.
If it were, you would have known that the baby didn’t die because the father hit him, beat him or dropped him.
No, the father took his baby to the hospital where quite possibly he died because of some negligence on the part of the hospital.
But in agenda driven reporting, that simply doesn’t make the front page.
I highly recommend you read Cosmix-X's post on the Cytryn story as he point out Derfner's discrepencies, bias, and all out fabrications far better than me.
And here is the A-7 post on the story.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Muqata War Updates
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(1)
- ► December 2012 (1)
-
►
2011
(44)
- ► October 2011 (1)
- ► September 2011 (3)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (5)
- ► March 2011 (7)
- ► February 2011 (6)
- ► January 2011 (6)
-
►
2010
(109)
- ► December 2010 (4)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (10)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (9)
- ► April 2010 (11)
- ► March 2010 (9)
- ► February 2010 (12)
- ► January 2010 (12)
-
►
2009
(277)
- ► December 2009 (14)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (17)
- ► September 2009 (19)
- ► August 2009 (17)
- ► April 2009 (18)
- ► March 2009 (34)
- ► February 2009 (32)
- ► January 2009 (29)
-
►
2008
(390)
- ► December 2008 (47)
- ► November 2008 (24)
- ► October 2008 (33)
- ► September 2008 (41)
- ► August 2008 (20)
- ► April 2008 (27)
- ► March 2008 (40)
- ► February 2008 (29)
- ► January 2008 (28)
-
►
2007
(318)
- ► December 2007 (14)
- ► November 2007 (26)
- ► October 2007 (25)
- ► September 2007 (20)
- ► August 2007 (32)
- ► April 2007 (31)
- ► March 2007 (34)
- ► February 2007 (28)
- ► January 2007 (18)
-
▼
2006
(333)
- ► December 2006 (16)
- ► November 2006 (19)
- ► October 2006 (12)
-
▼
September 2006
(21)
- Parodies in the Holy Land
- Where are the Police when you need them?
- The Saudi Initiative to Destroy Israel
- Shanah Tova
- How Iran will Nuke the US (and the rest of us)
- Why Israel is Better
- What is Israel doing in Eilat?
- I told you so
- Stop the ISM
- Why is the US still in Iraq?
- Emulating America(n Movies)
- Goodbye Barak (and good riddance)
- War College was Punishment!
- So much to write about and not enough time
- At what point does privacy begin and its invasion ...
- It’s all about the Agenda
- Have a Good Shabbos
- Nasrallah never believed Israel would go to war ov...
- Yet another war failure
- It’s an Illuuuusion
- Wiping the Settlers off the Map
- ► August 2006 (54)
- ► April 2006 (11)
- ► March 2006 (25)
- ► February 2006 (22)
- ► January 2006 (52)
-
►
2005
(88)
- ► December 2005 (32)
- ► November 2005 (18)
- ► October 2005 (5)
- ► September 2005 (12)
- ► August 2005 (21)